Posts Tagged ‘transparency’

Senate Seat for Sale

Tuesday, December 9th, 2008

Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich has been arrested and charged with corruption. Initial signs are appallingly bad.

Wiretap recordings indicate that Blagojevich was actively working to sell or trade Obama’s old seat in the Senate to the highest bidder, “I’m going to keep this Senate option for me a real possibility, you know, and therefore I can drive a hard bargain. You hear what I’m saying. And if I don’t get what I want and I’m not satisfied with it, then I’ll just take the Senate seat myself.”

Wow.

In exchange for the Senate seat Blagojevich asked for “a substantial salary” at a non-profit or labor union for himself, substantial meaning $250,000 to $300,000 a year. For his wife he sought memberships on corporate boards that would amount to $150,000 a year.

Apparently there was at least one candidate engaged in the bidding, “Candidate 5.” Blagojevich said that he received an offer of $500,000 from Candidate 5 in exchange for the seat.

In the very best possible light this evidence looks terrible. Again we appear to have found a politician engaged in the most offensive sort of political corruption. There is a temptation to think that we’ve found just one more bad apple but the truth is that our system is a bad apple factory.

Blagojevich may be one of the worst offenders but his actions are evidence of a more pervasive culture of corruption. A systemic addiction to money. Every political party is afflicted and each politician plays a part.

It is time for the people to raise their voices and insist on change. Blagojevich can become a catalyst for that change – take two minutes to pester your representatives and tell them that you’re mad as hell and not going to take it any more.

(Cross posted from http://change-congress.org/blog/2008/12/09/senate-seat-sale)

Wobid Screenplay: Robin Hood 2.0 (Apocalpse Now+Wikipedia: a response to financial chaos and greed)

Wednesday, October 22nd, 2008

All this pent up anger at 7 figure bonuses and super-rich CEO’s of crumbling companies requires a superhero level response. It got me thinking about a modern interpretation of Robin Hood.

A couple of related tweets encouraged me to throw the idea out into the world[1. (a) timoreilly Retweeting @jonl: Moyers implying the guys who plundered the U.S. economy should give it all back. <TOR: I've wondered about that too .... (b) @gnat: If Wall Street were in China, there'd be labor camps and executions for all the slimy pricks behind the subprime sleaze. I'd be for it. .].

Ours is a simple system of social physics: Injustice requires accountability, an adequate response from those in power. Those who robbed the system are made to pay: (1) they make restitution by giving back their ill-gotten gains and (2) they face some punitive measures, a punishment (prison?) which helps put the great karmic system back in equilibrium. These measures also serve as a deterrent to other would-be thieves.

As we all know too well – our systems of justice can be painfully ineffective.

The new Robin Hood steps in to fill this gap. RH 2.0 would run around and get our money back, by any means necessary; from slimey ceo’s, over-rich fat cats and boneheaded wall streeter’s pulling down million dollar bonuses…

Open season on thieves and those who give them cover.

A loner out for justice in a world gone mad.

RH is not super wealthy and gadget driven, I’m thinking something more along the lines of a semi-privileged Iraq War vet. World shattered, now he’s bringing the war home.  Something in the Col. Kurtz mold, best of the best but not quite as crazy. He took the traditional, patriotic path – he “did all the right things.” and with all of that training and intelligence – the logic inexorably led him down this pathway.

Fair. Smart. Just. Skilled. and not afraid to act.

Vigilante Justice?

There’s always something of a problem here. One man, dispensing justice according to his internal compass. There’s something terribly un-American about it. It’s just not democratic damn it!

So, I’m going to make an adjustment to the standard “loner” model. It’s not that RH is alone – RH acts alone but he’s driven by us.

Let’s add a Web 2.0 derived plot twist: crowdsourcing. Let the wisdom of crowds pick the victims. Wiki-justice.

A site about the scandal-makers goes up, it becomes a cultural touchstone. Data is uploaded, people review all of it and begin ranking the bad guys. The worst of the worst. Most wanted. and then RH, sitting at home – just as pissed as everyone else – begins to go after them…

Something like that :)

It would be a merger of the following: Apocalypse Now + Wikipedia + Punisher + kluster.com + McVeigh + Untouchables + Fight Club + Forest Gump + V for Vendetta + Clockwork Orange + Falling Down + The Burbs + Trading Places (1st half only) + Grumpy Old Men II

__________________________________